Out-of-tolerance decisions
Inspectors check what to do with a part that’s outside tolerance, from your quality procedures.
A vision model on the gateway checks every part and flags defects without sending images out of the plant.
How many rejects on line 2 this shift?
14 rejects, 11 of them surface scratches on the left side. That’s twice the usual rate.
Why was this part rejected?
Surface scratch over the allowed 2 mm on the left edge, matched to the quality standard.
When did the scratches start?
Around 14:20, after the fixture change on station 3. Before that, scratch rejects were rare.
Manual inspection at line speed misses defects, especially late in a shift. Cloud vision services need images to leave the plant and add delay at every part. Many plants do not allow production images off site at all.
Quality engineers, line leaders and operators, with cameras on the line and a gateway beside it.
Examples of good parts and each defect type, labelled by your quality team.
The model runs on the gateway next to the camera and checks every part as it passes.
Operators and engineers ask why a part was rejected and see the defect and the standard it broke.
Inspection keeps pace with the line.
Nothing is uploaded to inspect a part.
Each reject comes with an explanation people can check.
No. Inspection runs on the gateway. You choose whether any images are kept and where.
Yes. Label examples of the new defect, and the next version reaches the gateway over the air.
Only if you connect it to your line controls. On its own it flags and explains rejects.
Pick one team and one use case. We’ll have it running on your own devices in weeks.
Ask ChatGPT, Claude or Perplexity and see what they think. One click, instant insight.