Camera inspection at line speed
A vision model on the gateway checks every part and flags defects without sending images out of the plant.
With tools connected, inspectors raise a nonconformance with photos and details filled in.
Raise a quality issue for batch 2214.
I’ve drafted it with the photo and batch details. Approve to submit?
Add that it affects line 2 only.
Added. The report now says the issue was found on line 2 only, from 14:20.
Submit it.
Submitted to the quality system as a new nonconformance, and logged to the audit trail.
Raising a nonconformance means filling in a long form on a PC, so issues are reported late or not at all. Details such as batch, machine and photos get lost between the floor and the office. Incomplete reports slow down containment.
Inspectors, operators and quality engineers who raise nonconformance reports.
The inspector describes the problem and takes a photo; the assistant fills in batch, machine and part from what it knows.
The draft is shown for review, and nothing is submitted without approval.
With your quality system connected, the report is submitted, or queued until the device reconnects.
Issues are raised where they are found.
Batch, machine and photo details are filled in.
Nothing is submitted without the inspector’s OK.
No. The inspector reviews and approves every report.
The report is saved on the device and sent when it reconnects.
Any system with an API your team can connect as a tool.
Pick one team and one use case. We’ll have it running on your own devices in weeks.
Ask ChatGPT, Claude or Perplexity and see what they think. One click, instant insight.